Deploy OS capacity after overcloud service upgrade #1536
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Could you just add a note to the upgrade docs to say this will happen? |
We only started enabling this by default in Caracal, so this needs to get deployed as part of an Antelope->Caracal upgrade. Otherwise, the haproxy and grafana config gets put in place without the exporter being present.
MoteHue
force-pushed
the
os-capacity-after-upgrades
branch
from
5ae87a7 to
b8ff881
Compare
Alex-Welsh
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We only started enabling this by default in Caracal, so this needs to get deployed as part of an Antelope->Caracal upgrade. Otherwise, the haproxy and grafana config gets put in place without the exporter being present.